So I wax on about invention in art a whole lot. I decided I better put my money(or at least my pride) where my mouth is and test that theory. In conjunction with my good friend Timothy Haslet and his group of amazing artists, I entered the Coupeville Wa arts festival. Small town show, but they bring plenty of people through the door. Using clear substances with invented "brushes" I attempted to paint an Octopi and shrimp using only the bending of light. Possibly one of the ugliest pieces I have ever created. But the process did capture light and produced a new lens for the viewer to see subject. It was awarded Peoples Choice. Which asks the question: Is process and interest more important than the aesthetic result? Interesting vs. the relatable. I'm still undecided on what that balance should be.
